Heartland Forward Retreats From Findlay
FINDLAY - After continued controversy surrounding the Heartland Forward initiative by the citizens of Findlay, the internationalist organization has rescinded their offer to the city regarding their 30 by 2030 initiative.
After weeks of controversy surrounding the globalist aligned think tank, Heartland Forward, and the city-wide project designed to create a database tracking multiple citizen metrics, the organization has rescinded their offer to have the city take part in the program, leading council to remove the resolution from their upcoming agenda for the March 3 meeting.
In a letter from Mayor Christina Muryn attached to the agenda, citizen backlash, primarily in online discussions, caused the organization to retreat from their planned operation, leading to consternation from the mayor who lamented 'unfounded conspiracies' as the reason for the retreat. Though the letter submitted failed to cite specifically what conspiracies led to the retreat and why they were unfounded.
TOR has previously reported on the initiative, which initially started as a resolution for a five year commitment to the project the administration had hoped to pass in a single reading. After investigative inquiries revealed ties to internationalist organizations like The Rockefeller Foundation and World Economic Forum, the project appeared to align with clear designs to reshape city in specific images for unspecified 'investors'.
Findlay city council, with significant public backlash, pushed back against the initiative leading to a special meeting where Heartland Forward presented the project dashboard.
It was during this meeting that Muryn attempted to dispel concerns over Heartland Forward's pro-replacement migration philosophy, stating individual papers published by the organization discussing those concepts were specific to localities and done at the behest of those communities. This turned out to be inaccurate based on the organizations annual award ceremonies involving 'secret sauce' strategies which they advertise as being best practices for other communities to mimic, which included facilitating replacement migration.
At this time, it appears the citizens of Findlay have effectively pushed back against the initiative with some Council support, indicating a significant shift in the city of Findlay governance from previous terms, highlighting the effectiveness of citizen action against government initiatives they do not support.
