Make America Healthy Again By Dousing Our Bodies with Electromagnetics?
BY NICK ROGERS
In an unfortunately ironic MAHA twist, Robert Kennedy Jr.’s congressional testimony in June included a new worrying agenda item; a planned advertising blitz pressuring all Americans to purchase wearable biometric trackers “within four years.” The announcement – which comes in direct contrast to Children’s Health Defense’ stance on the issue (RFK Jr. is the group’s founder) – presents yet another government-backed hurdle for those members of the public aware and concerned about the health effects posed by exponentially growing levels of background electromagnetic frequencies (EMF) from WiFi, Bluetooth, 5G/6G, satellite internet and yes, “wearables.” The devices’ growing popularity also bolsters the well-established Smart/AI surveillance state, posing a privacy invasion on a massive scale.
“We do not share this vision,” Miriam Eckenfels, director of Children’s Health Defense’s Electromagnetic Radiation and Wireless Program, said. “We oppose governmental pressure to incentivize the widespread use of wearables. They pose serious health risks, especially to children,” she said. “We are eager to learn more about Secretary Kennedy’s full intent regarding wearables. The growing push for widespread adoption of wearables, which exposes users to constant RF (radio frequency) radiation in direct contact with the body, is concerning and fundamentally at odds with the values of informed consent, privacy and bodily autonomy that CHD defends.”
The immediate and cumulative harms of EMF/RF are well documented, and yet RFK Jr. is encouraging every American to put high-dose-emitting EMF devices are their bodies 24/7.
The justification is that these devices – replete with multiple transmitters, WiFi, and Bluetooth – can monitor valuable biometric data such as glucose levels, heart rate, sweat gland emissions, hormone levels, and now (via recent FDA approval) even sleep apnea. For those of us who have reviewed the data on EMF harm, the positives of these Smart wearables’ biometric tracking abilities do not come close to making up for the biological damage they cause (especially to the young, the old, and pregnant women).
And then there is the issue of biometric surveillance. The “internet of things” is turning into the “internet of people” and, with it, the push to integrate human bodies directly into the AI matrix is ever-increasing.
And while the Covid-19 “vaccinations” with their nano particles of transformative EMF-absorbing substances like graphene oxide may or may not be part of this agenda, the likes of Klaus Schwab, Ray Kurzweil, and other technocratic power players have made their desires known; connect human beings to artificial intelligence networks for real-time monitoring (and perhaps remote biological control?) down to the latest heartbeat. If all this sounds like progress to you, then by all means keep enjoying the Kool-Aid. If it sounds like a dystopian nightmare to you, know you are not alone.
“The public deserves radical transparency about wearables’ health and privacy risks, Ecknefels said "Their use must remain a personal choice and not a public health objective. What amounts to technocratic surveillance should not be normalized, encouraged and promoted at the federal level.”
The likes of Apple, Google, and Samsung no doubt stand to gain mightily on the financial front from this government endorsement, and it’s not far-fetched to speculate about a “you scratch my back, I scratch yours” situation when Google employees, for example, have loudly protested their company’s work on a Pentagon AI project. “Dual use” technology is all around us. The question is, would this technology be used for ill only against our “adversaries,” or are we, Americans, the adversaries in this burgeoning Smart surveillance state that likely would have made George Orwell blush?
At this point, wearables are not being forced upon the public like the Covid-19 shots through coercion and manipulation. Before the “pandemic,” the idea of state-mandated medical interventions may have sounded ludicrous to most. Post-“pandemic,” the idea of mandated health-monitoring devices (presented under the guise of saving us all from our chronic dietary/lifestyle shortcomings) doesn’t seem all that out of the question.
As RFK Jr. continues to predictably flip-flop on his prior-to-election vaccine stance, it seems the health contradictions have expanded to include an abrupt about-face on the very issue (EMF) that his brainchild, CHD, has vigorously pursued on behalf of protecting the public from outdated (and inaccurate) Federal Communications Commission RF guidelines.
The choice is yours, fellow consumer: buy a Smart wearable to track your body’s every statistic while being constantly beamed with DNA degrading electromagnetics, or make healthy lifestyle choices and surround yourself with a trusted team of physicians (ideally holistic) while exercising common sense by “listening to your body." One thing is clear: the “Make America Healthy Again” train is quickly derailing.
